Because of the mailing list server changeover, I waited an extra day to
post the results of the questionnaire. I hope everyone had an opportunity
to offer a vote and comments.
Thanks to those who participated. Your good ideas and your help is
Voting Results of the INET Rig Questionnaire
1 Vote Count Topic
1 Should we copy an "older Production" design?
0 Should we modify an "older production" design?
17 Should we design using modern techniques?
8 Should the design be simple and uncomplicated?
9 Should the design be complex with added
5 other (digital/RTTY)
The poll showed strong support for CW/SSB radio incorporating new
technology. (MODE both -13/new tech 17) CW takes second while
RTTY and/or digital modes hold third. (CW-6/RTTY*Digital-5)
The numbers favor the HF band, with VHF a very close second place.
As the design scheme unfolds, we need to decide the
simple/uncomplicated vs more complex/added features question (8 vs 9).
So, here we go with the next step.
73, and thanks.
Here is the next questionnaire:
(Please rank the bands according to preference. 1-high/10-low)
__ 220 and up
__ Should we use a single board design?
__ Should we use modular construction?
__ Should we use plug-in modules?
__ Should we base the design around the R2/T2 modules?
__ Should we design a single band rig?
__ Should we design a multiband rig?
__ Should we include outboard computer CW\RTTY encode/decode?
__ Should we include outboard computer frequency control?
__ Should we include LCD display?
__ RF output power? (in watts)
__ VFO range?
__ AGC? (type?)
Search QRP-L Archives
QRP-L Archive |
[ 1993 | 1994 | 1995 | 1996 | 1997 | 1998 | 1999 | 2000 ]
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 on Fri Jun 02 2000 - 11:26:58 EDT