Re: Make 14.040 new qrp freq

• Next message: Brian K. Short: "38s, Sierra Report(s)"
• Previous message: Frank Matthews: "Green Mountain 40 Transceiver Kit"
• Maybe in reply to: Jim/N0UR: "Make 14.040 new qrp freq"
• Next in thread: James Parsons: "Re: Make 14.040 new qrp freq"
• Reply: James Parsons: "Re: Make 14.040 new qrp freq"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

At 01:20 AM 4/8/97 +0000, you wrote:
>20 meters is such a great qrp band but 14.060 is being covered by digital
>signals (I know, cw is a digital signal), and its only going to get worse.
>Why not make 14.040 the new qrp calling freq? It would match the 40 meter
>freq. Next time tune down and listen, its just setting there waiting to be
>used.
>
>Jim

Hi Jim - I hate to say it...but I tend to agree with you.

We could "stand firm", and "refuse to be chased off 14060", but I don't see
it getting ANY better.
What do you say group?

CUL, Bill-N7MFB
>

• Next message: Brian K. Short: "38s, Sierra Report(s)"
• Previous message: Frank Matthews: "Green Mountain 40 Transceiver Kit"
• Maybe in reply to: Jim/N0UR: "Make 14.040 new qrp freq"
• Next in thread: James Parsons: "Re: Make 14.040 new qrp freq"
• Reply: James Parsons: "Re: Make 14.040 new qrp freq"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Search QRP-L Archives

[ QRP-L Archive | ]
[ 1993 | 1994 | 1995 | 1996 | 1997 | 1998 | 1999 | 2000 ]