Re: Using an Unbalanced Tuner with a Balanced Feedline

• Next message: Marshall Emm: "WWW 2K"
• Previous message: \: "RE: Balanced Tuners"
• In reply to: Bob Kellogg: "Re: Using an Unbalanced Tuner with a Balanced Feedline"
• Next in thread: Bob Kellogg: "Re: Using an Unbalanced Tuner with a Balanced Feedline"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Hi, Bob--

>>baluns. IMHO, however, some of these circuits are much
more efficient than using a separate balun to force
balance into an inherently unbalanced circuit. <<

VERY true. Commercial baluns have to be a compromise, and some of
them are not a very good one at that! I've never seen any figures on
the subject but I suspect that the broader the frequency "bandwidth"
of a balun, the lossier it is.
 

73
Marshall Emm
AA0XI/VK5FN
aa0xi@mtechnologies.com
http://www.mtechnologies.com/mthome

• Next message: Marshall Emm: "WWW 2K"
• Previous message: \: "RE: Balanced Tuners"
• In reply to: Bob Kellogg: "Re: Using an Unbalanced Tuner with a Balanced Feedline"
• Next in thread: Bob Kellogg: "Re: Using an Unbalanced Tuner with a Balanced Feedline"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Search QRP-L Archives

[ QRP-L Archive | ]
[ 1993 | 1994 | 1995 | 1996 | 1997 | 1998 | 1999 | 2000 ]