RE: Quads.. beauty and strength

---------

From: James C. Owen, III (owen@piper.eeel.nist.gov)
Date: Tue Mar 11 1997 - 11:01:43 EST


In message Mon, 10 Mar 1997 15:55:43 -0600 (CST),
  "Jeff M. Gold" <JMG@tntech.edu> writes:

> Hi,
>
> I just read James Duffey's post about Quads. I think that quads
> still have a bad reputation for being fragile things. I have had
> quite the opposite observations.
> We have had severe ice storms, snow and about as bad winds as you
> can imagine.

> Jeffro, AC4HF
>
I have to agree with you Jeffro. I have seen quads so loaded with ice that
you couldn't tell their original shape and as soon as the ice melted they
returned to normal.

A number of years ago, before his death of course, Clarence Moore W9LZX the
inventor of the quad, was an acquaintance of mine. I had a few discussions
 with him on why the quad does such a good job compared to a Yagi. His
theory, which he hadn't proved to his satisfaction, was even though both had
the same measured gain and F/B ratio the QUAD sounded better because it had
a greater capture area. I have a Photo that Clarence gave me of his last
Quad design and it is a beauty. 24 elements on 15 meters, 6 elements per
boom and 4 booms in a square arrangement. He said it operated like
"gangbusters" and I believe him. 72 Jim K4CGY qrp-l #72


Search QRP-L Archives

[ QRP-L Archive | ]
[ 1993 | 1994 | 1995 | 1996 | 1997 | 1998 | 1999 | 2000 ]

---------

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 on Fri Jun 02 2000 - 11:33:13 EDT

kd4ab@kd4ab.org