Mike,
Please don't think that I was demeaning the effort you put in finally
soving the problem(s); not at all! I just think that Larry deserves
recognition for all the early effort he put in; I believe you said he
compiled 82 pages of notes on the design and what he found. I was just
suggesting that there be two prizes and that I would gladly contribute to
an additional prize.
TNX es 72/73
Bob Parks
K6AEC (Las Vegas)
Sorry for the BW, gang.
On Wed, 5 Mar 1997 16:30:11 -0800 "Michael A. Gipe"
<mgipe@reliablemeters.com> writes:
>Bob --
>
>I wholeheartedly agree. I would not have been able to get where I did
>without Larry's work. I don't know how to do it, but I think Larry
>deserves a large part of the reward and recognition.
>
>This was NOT a case where the first debugger was stumped and the
>second
>found the magic solution. Larry did a fantastic job, and I have no
>doubt
>that he would have been 100% successful given a few more days. The
>problem
>just needed more than one week, and I would not have succeeded if I
>was the
>first one on the list.
>
>Although billed as a race between competitors, it was more like a
>relay
>race with all the members on the same team, each one contributing to
>the
>final goal. I got help from Larry and from the other debuggers
>further
>down the list.
>
>Of course, this may be moot if the judges find fault with the rig!
>
>If you saw a TenTec1340 in half do you get two TenTec 1320s?
>
>I'm open to suggestions.
>
>Mike K1MG
>
>
>> Doug,
>>
>> I don't think that it is quite fair to reward just Mike; Larry did
>a
>> fantastic job, also, and just ran out of time. Mike was able to
>"build"
>> on Larry's effort and finish the job. I'm not in a position to
>contribute
>> another prize, but I would certainly be willing to contribute toward
>one
>> for Larry.
>>
>> What do you say?
>>
>> 72/73
>>
>> Bob Parks
>> K6AEC (Las Vegas)
>>
>>
>
>
[
QRP-L Archive |
]
[
1993 |
1994 |
1995 |
1996 |
1997 |
1998 |
1999 |
2000
]