Bob --
I wholeheartedly agree. I would not have been able to get where I did
without Larry's work. I don't know how to do it, but I think Larry
deserves a large part of the reward and recognition.
This was NOT a case where the first debugger was stumped and the second
found the magic solution. Larry did a fantastic job, and I have no doubt
that he would have been 100% successful given a few more days. The problem
just needed more than one week, and I would not have succeeded if I was the
first one on the list.
Although billed as a race between competitors, it was more like a relay
race with all the members on the same team, each one contributing to the
final goal. I got help from Larry and from the other debuggers further
down the list.
Of course, this may be moot if the judges find fault with the rig!
If you saw a TenTec1340 in half do you get two TenTec 1320s?
I'm open to suggestions.
Mike K1MG
> Doug,
>
> I don't think that it is quite fair to reward just Mike; Larry did a
> fantastic job, also, and just ran out of time. Mike was able to "build"
> on Larry's effort and finish the job. I'm not in a position to contribute
> another prize, but I would certainly be willing to contribute toward one
> for Larry.
>
> What do you say?
>
> 72/73
>
> Bob Parks
> K6AEC (Las Vegas)
>
>
[
QRP-L Archive |
]
[
1993 |
1994 |
1995 |
1996 |
1997 |
1998 |
1999 |
2000
]