Band Plans and Morse Code Tests

---------

From: Dave.Ackrill@westwood45.powergen.co.uk
Date: Tue Mar 04 1997 - 04:33:34 EST


     
     I usually avoid copying chunks of previous messages, but I make an
     exception this time. Yesterday there was a message which contained
     the following:-
     
     "While it's true that the FCC won't ban CW, the potential problem is
     when all licenses are code free there MAY also be no sub-bands set
     aside for CW. SSB will be allowed on any frequency including those now
     CW only. It will make operating (CW) a lot harder. 72 Jim K4CGY qrp-l
     #72"
     
     Why doesn't this argument apply to all the other modes like RTTY,
     Packet, ATV and FM? They all seem to have their specified areas. In
     fact you could argue that a CW enthusiast can operate anywhere in most
     bands (in the UK bandplans there are "CW and SSB" and "All Modes"
     sections plus areas for FM etc), but has an exclusive section which is
     usually at the bottom of the band. The only mode that enjoys this
     privilege.
     
     In my opinion the argument that CW will be "squeezed out" when the
     Morse Code Test is removed is designed to engender a purely emotive
     reaction to the no-code argument. It also ignores the view that CW
     enthusiasts, like those interested in every other mode, will soon have
     to encourage new enthusiasts to the mode rather than rely on a
     compulsory test. It will be the success and ability to do this
     recruiting which will ensure the continuation of the "CW Only" parts
     of the band in the future and, again in my opinion, the sooner we get
     on with it rather than using arguments that are weakened by emotive
     language against no-code licenses, the easier it will be to prove that
     CW is still alive and well and needs space on the bands.
     
     Think of the QRP/QRO situation, if no new QRP enthusiasts were being
     recruited then there would be no need for areas of the bands for QRP
     operation. There isn't an additional 'test' to use QRP, yet the
     numbers of QRP enthusiasts seems to be growing. I believe that this
     is due to the enthusiasm, time and effort put in by those who visit
     clubs and Elmer people new to QRP and that a 'QRP Test' would be
     counter productive to encouraging new QRP operators.
     
     Before the flames come rolling in, I know that there are those who do
     a great job of Elmering new CW enthusiasts and talk about CW and Morse
     Code to clubs, but I think that more of us who like CW need to get
     proactively involved in encouraging new CW users, ready for the time
     when the Morse Code Test is removed.
     
     I wonder how quickly Packet or QRP operation would have grown and
     developed had people been obliged to pass a 'Packet Test' or a 'QRP
     Test' before going on the mode? I know that I wouldn't have bothered
     to have a go if this had been the case.
     
     Regards de Dave (G0DJA)


Search QRP-L Archives

[ QRP-L Archive | ]
[ 1993 | 1994 | 1995 | 1996 | 1997 | 1998 | 1999 | 2000 ]

---------

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 on Fri Jun 02 2000 - 11:33:08 EDT

kd4ab@kd4ab.org