At 10:59 AM 2/22/97 -0500, you wrote:
>Gang..
>
>I just read "the letter". Try to get unemotional about it and read the
>letter again. The basis for this guy's gripe is valid!..the receiving
>operator IS doing the work.
>
>I think we owe it to the operator on the other end to let him know IN ADVANCE
>he will be working a QRP station (by signing "/qrp").
So he will work a weak qro station rather than a weak qrp station? I think
he just doesn't want to work at it. All the best apples don't just fall off
the tree...you /ve got to pick a few of them.
>All of us and many of
>the rest of the Ham community ENJOY the challenge of working a QRP station
>....but we should not burden those who do not.
>
I don't think it's a burden to listen to any or our signals. Judging from
the FYBO contest this weekend, there were lots of qrp signals, and most all
of them very readable.
73,
Bob, KI7MN Chandler, AZ ScQRPion QRP-L #271, NorCal #1228, CQC #274, QRP
ARCI #8918, AK QRP #30, not in any order of importance.
[
QRP-L Archive |
]
[
1993 |
1994 |
1995 |
1996 |
1997 |
1998 |
1999 |
2000
]