Re: another theory to ponder: (HI)

---------

From: \ (W.Kimura@valley.net)
Date: Sun Feb 16 1997 - 18:59:54 EST


At 01:40 AM 2/15/97 -0700, you wrote:
>Just when you think you got it all figured out, something like the
>following shows up- makes you wonder. You can kinda make a connection
>between this and the SMOKE* theory ;-)
>*smoke makes electical stuff work- when you let it (smoke) out- that
>part/unit doesn't work anymore.....
>HI , 73 de Phil K6LS
>
>
> The Dark Sucker Theory
> For years, it has been believed that electric bulbs emit light, but
>recent information has proved otherwise. Electric bulbs don't emit
>light; they suck dark. Thus, we call these bulbs Dark Suckers. The Dark
>Sucker Theory and the existence of dark suckers prove that dark has mass
>and is heavier than light.

My estimed collegues, allow me to present Kim's first corollary of smoke and
light.

That similar to electronic failure caused by allowing smoke to escape from
an operating circuit, breaking an operating dark sucker (a.k.a. light bulb)
will allow the previously sucked and stored dark to escape and cover the
light rather quickly.

I look forward to peer review and validation of this exciting and
illuminating phenomonon.

Kim Kimura, N1MVU


Search QRP-L Archives

[ QRP-L Archive | ]
[ 1993 | 1994 | 1995 | 1996 | 1997 | 1998 | 1999 | 2000 ]

---------

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 on Fri Jun 02 2000 - 11:33:00 EDT

kd4ab@kd4ab.org