**Next message:**BOB SCHNICK, DIRECTOR, LECOM LIBRARIES: "Operating in VE7-Land"**Previous message:**Luis R. Anaya: "Help with a Mod"**Messages sorted by:**[ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

I received this...which makes me think I should have worded my

posting better.

*> Steve, I saw your post concerning using a 40M dipole for a 2M
*

*> antenna. Just have one question, what is the "N" in the formula,
*

*> and where did you find this referenced. I am always searching for
*

*> additional antenna ideas and would like to understand this concept.
*

*>
*

*> ------- Length-in-feet = ( 0.95 + N ) * 492 / Freq-in-MHz --------
*

*>
*

*> 73 KC5DVT Wayne email...ehayes@vnet.ibm.com
*

The reference is "The ARRL Antenna Book" ...harmonic antennas. Or look

in the ARRL Handbook.

Allow me to correct my formula ("formula" means an empirical calculation

method).

Length(feet) = (N-0.05) * 492 / Freq-in-MHz

This is the formula for "harmonic" antennas. Now I will illustrate the

role of "N". N is the harmonic number.

I want to make an antenna for 40 M...specifically for 7.00 MHz. Because

this is the fundamental frequency (1st harmonic), N=1.

L = (1 - 0.05) * 492 / 7.00 (because N=1)

L = 0.95 * 492 / 7.00

L = 468 / 7.00 (Is "468" familiar?)

L = 66.86 ft

I cut the wire and erect the dipole.

I decide to use this 40 M dipole on 15 M because at 3-halfwaves operation

it's feed point will be a current null. Let's calculate the resonant freq

of this 40 M dipole. N=3 because this is 3rd harmonic. (7 x 3 = 21)

L = (3 - 0.05) * 492 / Freq (because N=3, 7 MHz * 3 = 21 MHz)

Freq = (3 - 0.05) * 492 / Length (did you follow the rearrangement?)

Freq = 2.95 * 492 / 66.86 (wire antenna already exists)

Freq = 21.71 MHz

Ooops...the 40 M dipole appears to be "too short." :^) Not to worry

if you are using a "good" TransMatch.

Let's see how long a three halfwaves antenna would be on 21 MHz.

L = 2.95 * 492 / 21.00 = 69.11 ft

And what is the "40 M" resonant frequency of that antenna?

69.11 = 0.95 * 492 / Length

L = 468/69.11 = 6.76 MHz

Will it help to make the original antenna shorter on 40 M? Let cut one

for the other end of the band: 7.3 MHz.

L = (1-0.05) * 492 / 7.3 = 64.03 ft

Freq = (3-0.05) * 492 / 64.03 = 22.67 MHz

Twice we have proved that when we intend to operate a 40 M antenna

intensively on both 40 M and 15 M, we perhaps should make a compromise

is the direction of cutting to the low end of 40 M...or even below.

Why?

Because I use a MFJ cheapy "fix-taps" TransMatch...and it is problematic

to tame the "SWR" on 15 M, the shorter the antenna is on 40 M.

If you have a *nice* roller inductor-type TransMatch, it really doesn't

matter what you cut your antenna to...you will always be able to find

a setting to achive 1:1 "SWR". :^)

Hint: I put "SWR" in quotes, so no flame wars please. ;^) A transmatch

device TRANSforms a presented impedance to achieve a MATCH....which

we usually determine via an SWR meter at the transmitter coaxial plug.

Now, does one need to be concerned with whether the

*particular* 40 M antenna is actually even-harmonic or odd-harmonic

length on 2 M? I think not. I believe *other* factors come into

dominant play and make it moot.

-- 73/Steve/AB4EL ab4el@Cybernetics.NET in Raleigh, NC 35.81245N, 78.65849W

**Next message:**BOB SCHNICK, DIRECTOR, LECOM LIBRARIES: "Operating in VE7-Land"**Previous message:**Luis R. Anaya: "Help with a Mod"**Messages sorted by:**[ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

**[
QRP-L Archive |
] [
1993 |
1994 |
1995 |
1996 |
1997 |
1998 |
1999 |
2000
] **