From: John J. Welch (email@example.com)
> Hmmm, nobody caught the obvious error(s) in my otherwise good post or
> perhaps you are all such nice guys that you thought you wouldn't mention it :-)
> A square wave (with 1:1 mark:space ratio) has only odd harmonics. This
> means the basic ideas presented are OK (and the basic conclusion is
> unchanged -- you need a LPF on the output) but the numbers are wrong.
> The amplitudes of the harmonics of a square wave goes as 1/n**2 (did I
> get this wrong too?)
> The first spurious emission is the third harmonic which will be 1/9 of
> the fundamental in amplitude and 1/81of the power of the fundamental
> (power goes as the voltage squared). This implies the spurious
> emissions are about -19dBc. The FCC wants -40dBc or better.
> Anyone got a spectrum analyzer and a square wave oscillator to check
> this revised figure?
I caught it, but was a nice guy :-) (too busy to reply :-) )
Still think you're wrong - I beleive *power* goes as 1/n**2, as I can
barely see -20db distortion on a scope. I have an analyzer, and when
I looked at it I got approx -6ish for the 3rd. Will double-check on
Friday with the comm analyzer and a 20M oscillator.
Also, FCC regs want -30dbc if you're power out is <5 watts, if over 5
they want -40dbc *or* some small level, whichever is less.
ps if you're the one building a DDS rig, Analog Devices has been a real
bear to work with - AD9955 lead time is 22 weeks for samples, they won't
sell partial trays, the price for <100 pieces is *very* high, they don't
let *ordinary* people buy the eval kits and so forth. I've had much
better luck with Qualcomm...
Search QRP-L Archives
QRP-L Archive |
[ 1993 | 1994 | 1995 | 1996 | 1997 | 1998 | 1999 | 2000 ]
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 on Fri Jun 02 2000 - 11:26:09 EDT